Placeholder canvas
Date: August 19, 2022

When Former Employees Go Off the Rails: Obtaining Relief from the Court to Stop Threats and Harassment by Former Employees By: Tessa Mansfield Hirte

by foleyandmansfield
Date: August 19, 2022
by foleyandmansfield

When Former Employees Go Off the Rails: Obtaining Relief from the Court to Stop Threats and Harassment by Former Employees By: Tessa Mansfield Hirte

Placeholder canvas

Terminating an employee is often a challenging and emotional process, and terminated employees may react with shock, sadness, frustration, or even aggression. But what can an employer do if a former employee takes it a step further and starts harassing—even threatening to harm—his or her former coworkers? How can the company respond to these threats, and what can it do to protect its employees? Depending on the nature, severity, and frequency of the threats, the company may be entitled to a court order prohibiting the former employee from contacting or harassing his former coworkers.

Most states have laws that allow a person who is the victim of harassment to obtain an order prohibiting further harassment. While such orders are typically sought by individual victims of harassment, some states allow companies to obtain these orders. For example, Minnesota courts have clarified that a company may be considered a “person” for purposes of obtaining a harassment restraining order. Other states, including Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina, Rhode Island, and Tennessee, have enacted statutes that expressly allow companies to obtain similar types of restraining orders.

Whether a court will grant a harassment restraining order will depend on whether the conduct meets the definition of “harassment” under state law. Under Minnesota law, for example, “harassment” includes, among other acts, “repeated incidents of intrusive or unwanted acts, words, or gestures that have a substantial adverse effect or are intended to have a substantial adverse effect on the safety, security, or privacy of another.” A single incident of harassment or statements that are simply inappropriate or argumentative are typically not enough to be considered harassment. However, threats of physical violence, repeated text messages, e-mails, or phone calls, or multiple incidents of threatening gestures or statements may constitute harassment.

What if the former employee is not threatening to harm employees, but instead is threatening to harm the company’s business interests and reputation? A harassment restraining order is likely not available to prevent or stop threats by a former employee to contact customers, divulge confidential information, or take other actions that could harm the company’s business and reputation. The company may be entitled to different relief, including temporary or injunctive relief in state or federal courts.

Contact one of Foley & Mansfield’s experienced attorneys for guidance in obtaining the appropriate type of relief in response to threats by former employees.

Tessa Mansfield Hirte 

Attorney – Minneapolis

tmansfield@foleymansfield.com

612-216-0373

Florida Supreme Court Ruling Upends “Marriage Before Injury” Common Law Understanding of Spousal Recovery in Wrongful Death Cases

The Florida Supreme Court has upended a longstanding common law understanding of spousal recovery in wrongful death cases. In a recent decision, the Florida Supreme Court held that a spouse who married a decedent after the onset of the injury that caused decedent’s death is in fact a “surviving spouse” […]

LEARN MORE

Thermonuclear Verdicts on the Rise According to Recent Study

Marathon Strategies published a study regarding the rise in the number of “nuclear verdicts”—those with verdicts surpassing $10 million in damages—in the United States in 2023 and termed a new phrase– “thermonuclear verdicts.” The number of cases with nuclear verdicts has increased in 2023 by 27% from 2022, a 15-year […]

LEARN MORE

EPA’s Final Rule to Reduce Methane and Other Pollution from Oil and Natural Gas Operations

In November 2021, pursuant to the Biden Administration’s “U.S. Methane Emissions Reduction Plan” and under the terms of the Inflation Reduction Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published a proposed rule intended to mitigate climate-destabilizing pollution and protect human health by reducing greenhouse gases, including methane, and volatile organic compound […]

LEARN MORE