Focusing on Technology
In an industry known for its resistance to adopting new and evolving technologies, the Foley Mansfield team understands that new tools are essential for providing highly effective services to our clients. By employing state-of-the-art technologies, we can develop smarter, faster litigation and arbitration strategies that fit the needs of your business while simultaneously reducing costs.
All of our team members have experience working with new technologies, providing quality services to clients who embrace innovation.
New and advanced technologies
Our innovative technologies, aimed at providing cost-effective counsel and improved service to clients, including the automated document management system Nextpoint for document review, Elite 3E Financial software, BigHand digital dictation, TrialDirector trial presentation platforms, and, LAW PreDiscovery for internal E-discovery processing. Additionally, we keep Certified E-Discovery Specialists (CEDS) on staff. Each of these elements improves the client experience, and the reductions in administrative costs are passed on to you.
Related News
Redefining The Workforce: Implementation of the DOL’s Independent Contractor Rule
On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor’s much anticipated rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act regarding the classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors officially came into effect. However, there are several pending lawsuits in different states seeking to prohibit the implementation of the new […]
LEARN MOREAmended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation
A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]
LEARN MORESummarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”
Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]
LEARN MORERedefining The Workforce: Implementation of the DOL’s Independent Contractor Rule
On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor’s much anticipated rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act regarding the classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors officially came into effect. However, there are several pending lawsuits in different states seeking to prohibit the implementation of the new […]
LEARN MOREAmended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation
A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]
LEARN MORESummarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”
Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]
LEARN MORE