Placeholder canvas
Date: February 9, 2016

Gary D. Sharp Obtains Defense Verdict in New York Supreme Court

by foleyandmansfield
Date: February 9, 2016
by foleyandmansfield

Gary D. Sharp Obtains Defense Verdict in New York Supreme Court

Placeholder canvas

Foley & Mansfield partner Gary D. Sharp of the firm’s Oakland and Detroit offices, along with national coordinating counsel Carmen N. Anderson of Milwaukee’s von Briesen & Roper and local counsel Dan Brady of Buffalo’s Hagerty & Brady successfully defended an equipment manufacturer against a wrongful death claim brought by the estate of a gentleman diagnosed with mesothelioma.

Although a large number of companies were sued originally, the firm’s client was the only company who took the case to trial in the Supreme Court of New York, County of Lewis. After hearing evidence during a three and a half week trial, the jury deliberated for two hours before returning a defense verdict on all causes of action brought against it. The jury found that the company did not need to provide a warning regarding asbestos-containing gaskets and that the company’s compressors were not defectively designed. Plaintiff’s counsel requested $2.3 million during their closing argument.

Gary D. Sharp

A Tidal Wave of Regulations: How New Federal Regulations on Drinking Water May Affect U.S. Businesses

New regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency and the White House will not be watering down toxic tort litigation any time soon. On April 10, 2024, the Biden-Harris administration issued a national first —a federal standard that seeks to regulate per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals”, in […]

LEARN MORE

Redefining The Workforce: Implementation of the DOL’s Independent Contractor Rule

On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor’s much anticipated rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act regarding the classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors officially came into effect. However, there are several pending lawsuits in different states seeking to prohibit the implementation of the new […]

LEARN MORE

Amended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation

A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]

LEARN MORE