> Insights > Client Alert: Minnesota Asbestos Trial Verdict Changes Historical Settlement Values

> Insights > Client Alert: Minnesota Asbestos Trial Verdict Changes Historical Settlement Values

Client Alert: Minnesota Asbestos Trial Verdict Changes Historical Settlement Values

June 8, 2016News

On June 8, 2016, after a three and one-half week trial, an eight-member jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in a Minnesota wrongful death asbestos case (Jenella Conda, on behalf of the heirs of Ronald Conda v. 3M, et al.).  This is the second plaintiffs’ verdict in a Minnesota asbestos case in the past five years. 

Trial began on May 16, 2016, against seven defendants including Borg-Warner Morse TEC LLC, Fluor Daniels, Foster Wheeler, Georgia-Pacific, Honeywell International, Ingersoll Rand, and Smith-Sharpe.  Borg-Warner, Foster Wheeler, Georgia-Pacific, and Ingersoll Rand settled during the first two weeks of trial.  Smith-Sharpe was voluntarily dismissed by the remaining parties.  The Court granted Fluor’s directed verdict motion at the end of Plaintiff’s case-in-chief.  Plaintiff presented expert testimony by Dr. Eugene Mark, Dr. Ed Holstein, and Dr. Arnold Brody.  Plaintiff was represented by Jessica Dean and Ben Braly.  They focused their case on Mr. Conda’s work replacing brakes on automobiles with his father growing up, at a Standard Oil service station for two years, and on various personal vehicles throughout his lifetime.

Honeywell called Dr. Michael Graham, Dr. David H. Garabrandt, Mr. Charles Blake, and Mr. Thomas McCaffrey as expert witnesses. Honeywell defended the case with a chrystotile defense. Honeywell also pointed to Mr. Conda’s exposures during his service in United States Navy for three years on the USS Radford and to Mr. Conda’s 30-year career as an ironworker at electrical generating power plants for Xcel Energy f/k/a Northern States Power.  

After one day of deliberation, the jury assigned the following fault: 10% to Honeywell, 10% to Foster Wheeler, and 80% to NSP (Mr. Conda’s employer).

The total damages were $3,700,000 with the following breakdown:  $223,533 (past medicals/income loss – pension/social security which was stipulated to by both parties) and $3,477,000 in pecuniary damages (loss of advice, comfort, and guidance to Mr. Conda’s widow and four adult children).  Honeywell did make a motion for a mistrial following closing arguments. The motion is currently under advisement.

This verdict is significant because it will change the historical settlement values in Minnesota for wrongful death cases.  Prior to today’s verdict, the average jury verdict value for a wrongful death case in Minnesota was approximately $400,000.

 

For additional information, please contact Joanna Salmen in our Minneapolis office at 612.338.8788. 

Foley & Mansfield Logo

Related Practice Areas & Industries

View All Practice Areas & Industries

Related Locations

View All Locations

Related Professionals

View All Professionals

Recent News & Insights

  • Foley Mansfield Secures Defense Verdict in Silica Wrongful Death Trial

    LOS ANGELES, JUNE 6, 2025 — Foley Mansfield is pleased to report a significant victory in Solano-Claustro v. Dal-Tile, a silica wrongful death case tried in Los Angeles Superior Court....

  • Foley Mansfield Secures Summary Judgment Victory in Missouri Personal Injury Case

    5/22/25, Scott County, MO - Foley Mansfield, PLLP is elated to report that a team from the firm’s St. Louis and Edwardsville offices has obtained summary judgment in favor...

  • Foley Mansfield Secures Summary Judgment for Municipality in New York Personal Injury Case

    NEW YORK, May 13, 2025 — Foley Mansfield is pleased to announce that a team from the firm’s New York office has obtained summary judgment in favor of a...

  • FM Welcomes Back Joe Rejano as Director of Artificial Intelligence & Innovation

    Chicago, IL – 5/6/2025 – Foley Mansfield is pleased to announce the return of Joe Rejano to the firm in the newly established role of Director of Artificial Intelligence &...