Comprehensive and Strategic Representation
Our Appellate Practice Group of highly skilled attorneys possesses a deep understanding of appellate practice, honed through years of rigorous education and practical experience. Many of our attorneys have undergone specialized training in appellate advocacy. This background equips us with the tools necessary to navigate the intricacies of appellate courts, craft persuasive legal arguments, and effectively present them before appellate courts. Our Appellate Practice Group additionally offers strategic guidance at the trial level, including protecting the record and preserving potential issues for appellate review. Our trial strategy and support augment our client representation throughout all phases of litigation.
Our firm offers a comprehensive range of appellate services tailored to meet the unique needs of our clients. Prior to a client facing the prospect of an appeal, our appellate litigation lawyers are prepared to step into action and provide a thorough evaluation and analysis. We meticulously scrutinize trial records, identify potential legal errors, and develop a compelling appellate strategy designed to secure a favorable outcome.
Our appellate services encompass drafting writ petitions and appellate briefs, as well as pre-trial, trial, and post-trial motions. We conduct rigorous legal research to support our clients’ positions, and present oral arguments before appellate courts, arguments at dispositive motion hearings and during trial.
We recognize the importance of maintaining open lines of communication with our clients throughout the appellate process, ensuring that they remain fully informed and engaged at every stage. Our collaborative approach fosters a strong attorney-client relationship which allows us to develop legal strategies that align with our clients’ objectives.
When faced with the challenges of appeals, clients can trust Foley Mansfield to provide them with unmatched appellate litigation expertise.
For more information about our firm’s Appellate Practice Group’s ligation, trial strategy, and appeals services or to discuss your specific legal needs, please contact our practice co-chairs Mary Street or Margaret Johnson to schedule a consultation. We look forward to the opportunity to serve as your trusted partner in appellate advocacy.
Co-Chairs
Mary Street
Partner - Miami
Margaret Johnson
Partner - Los Angeles
Related News
Amended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation
A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]
LEARN MORESummarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”
Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]
LEARN MOREMinnesota Legislature Seeks to Change Newly Effective Earned Safe and Sick Time Law
By now, employers should be familiar with and implementing (if applicable) Minnesota’s Earned Safe and Sick Time law (“ESST”) that took effect on January 1, 2024. ESST is paid leave that an employee may use when they or a family member are sick, need to see a doctor or medical […]
LEARN MOREAmended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation
A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]
LEARN MORESummarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”
Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]
LEARN MOREMinnesota Legislature Seeks to Change Newly Effective Earned Safe and Sick Time Law
By now, employers should be familiar with and implementing (if applicable) Minnesota’s Earned Safe and Sick Time law (“ESST”) that took effect on January 1, 2024. ESST is paid leave that an employee may use when they or a family member are sick, need to see a doctor or medical […]
LEARN MORE