Placeholder canvas
Date: August 15, 2012

U of MN Taconite Workers Health Study Interim Results Released

by foleyandmansfield
Date: August 15, 2012
by foleyandmansfield

U of MN Taconite Workers Health Study Interim Results Released

 

U of MN Taconite Workers Health Study Interim Results Released

Minnesota’s Iron Range has long been the subject of discussion and debate surrounding the potential health risks from  taconite mining and processing – from the landmark 1970’s Reserve Mining case (which ultimately banned the dumping of “asbestos-like” minerals found in taconite tailings into Lake Superior) to the state’s DOH studies earlier in this decade linking the region’s increased levels of mesothelioma to the commercial asbestos found in taconite processing plants.

On April 12, 2013, the University of Minnesota School of Public Health and the Minnesota Taconite Workers Lung Health Partnership held a public meeting to discuss interim findings of a highly-anticipated five year, nearly $5 million dollar study on taconite worker health issues. These and subsequent findings may have widespread implications for the state’s economy and workers health policies – not to mention the strategies undertaken by both defense and plaintiff’s attorneys in asbestos litigation nationwide.

According to the interim report, researchers could not definitively link taconite dust to mesothelioma and other lung diseases, but did find that the longer a worker was on the job, the greater the risk. They stated that although dust particulates found in the mining operations are within federal guidelines, the “elongated mineral particles” or EMPs in taconite dust are smaller than what the government actually measures. The researchers plan to further study the risk these fibers may pose.

Researchers have focused on the approximately 46,000 people born since 1920 who have worked in the production of taconite, mined and processed in Minnesota since the 1950s. More information on this study can be viewed here.

Foley & Mansfield’s Minneapolis asbestos team has been following Iron Range developments for years. For additional information and analysis, please contact Joanna Salmen at 612.338.8788.

 

 

Related News

Amended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation

A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]

LEARN MORE

Summarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”

Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]

LEARN MORE

Minnesota Legislature Seeks to Change Newly Effective Earned Safe and Sick Time Law

By now, employers should be familiar with and implementing (if applicable) Minnesota’s Earned Safe and Sick Time law (“ESST”) that took effect on January 1, 2024. ESST is paid leave that an employee may use when they or a family member are sick, need to see a doctor or medical […]

LEARN MORE