Placeholder canvas
Date: January 25, 2017

Thomas Harder Successfully Defends Private School Against Contractual, Tort Claims

by foleyandmansfield
Date: January 25, 2017
by foleyandmansfield

Thomas Harder Successfully Defends Private School Against Contractual, Tort Claims

Placeholder canvas

Following a four-day bench trial, Foley & Mansfield attorney Thomas Harder obtained a defense verdict in Carver County, Minnesota on behalf of an co-educational private high school and its employee involving the alleged assault and battery of the Plaintiff.

The case originally alleged five counts against the Defendants. First, and most significantly, the Complaint alleged breach of contract against the school, asserting that its published mission statement constituted a contractual obligation. The Defense argued that while a mission statement may communicate the high-level ideals of an organization, such as educating and nurturing students, it is not a contract between the parties. In other words, a parent cannot sue a school simply because their child is failing or otherwise not reaching their potential, as a stated mission is an aspirational statement, not an enforceable contractual obligation.

Other claims alleged by the Plaintiff were assault and battery and defamation against the employee, vicarious liability (claiming the school was liable for the alleged actions of the employee), and negligent retention and supervision against the school. With the exception of the assault and battery claim, all other counts were dismissed on a motion for summary judgment. 

At trial on the assault and battery claim, Plaintiff sought $30,000 in emotional stress damages and $50,000 in future damages, plus attorneys’ fees in excess of $80,000.

On January 17, 2017, the court found that Plaintiff did not prove that the employee assaulted Plaintiff because “mere words or threats alone do not constitute assault”.  Plaintiff also failed to prove that the Defendants intentionally caused harmful or offensive contact with Plaintiff.  The Complaint was dismissed with prejudice. 

In addition to the uncommon legal assertion that the school’s mission statement constituted a contract, it is also highly unusual for an assault and battery claim to go to trial when there is no claim of any actual physical injury of any sort.  Accordingly, the case law relied upon by both Foley & Mansfield and the court were cases from early in the last century.  

Thomas Harder

Florida Supreme Court Ruling Upends “Marriage Before Injury” Common Law Understanding of Spousal Recovery in Wrongful Death Cases

The Florida Supreme Court has upended a longstanding common law understanding of spousal recovery in wrongful death cases. In a recent decision, the Florida Supreme Court held that a spouse who married a decedent after the onset of the injury that caused decedent’s death is in fact a “surviving spouse” […]

LEARN MORE

Thermonuclear Verdicts on the Rise According to Recent Study

Marathon Strategies published a study regarding the rise in the number of “nuclear verdicts”—those with verdicts surpassing $10 million in damages—in the United States in 2023 and termed a new phrase– “thermonuclear verdicts.” The number of cases with nuclear verdicts has increased in 2023 by 27% from 2022, a 15-year […]

LEARN MORE

EPA’s Final Rule to Reduce Methane and Other Pollution from Oil and Natural Gas Operations

In November 2021, pursuant to the Biden Administration’s “U.S. Methane Emissions Reduction Plan” and under the terms of the Inflation Reduction Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published a proposed rule intended to mitigate climate-destabilizing pollution and protect human health by reducing greenhouse gases, including methane, and volatile organic compound […]

LEARN MORE