Placeholder canvas
Date: June 3, 2019

Scully, Groseclose and Mularczyk Named to 2019 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars® List

by foleyandmansfield
Date: June 3, 2019
by foleyandmansfield

Scully, Groseclose and Mularczyk Named to 2019 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars® List

Placeholder canvas

Foley & Mansfield is pleased to announce that three partners from the firm’s Los Angeles office have been named to the 2019 Southern California Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars® lists.  

Named to the Super Lawyers list is partner Thomas G. Scully for his work in Personal Injury – Products Defense.  Named to the Rising Stars® list are partners M. Amadea Groseclose and Peter M. Mularczyk. Both were selected for their work in the area of Civil Litigation – Defense.

All focus their work in the firm’s national asbestos defense practice. Foley & Mansfield’s Los Angeles office provides a broad range of complex litigation defense services to regional and national companies, either directly, or through appointment by their insurers.

Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a rigorous multi-phased process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates, and peer reviews by practice area. Rising Stars follows a similar process to recognize up-and-coming attorneys who are age 40 or younger, or who have been in practice for 10 years or less.

 

We invite you to learn more about these remarkable attorneys.

Super Lawyers Rising Stars

Redefining The Workforce: Implementation of the DOL’s Independent Contractor Rule

On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor’s much anticipated rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act regarding the classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors officially came into effect. However, there are several pending lawsuits in different states seeking to prohibit the implementation of the new […]

LEARN MORE

Amended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation

A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]

LEARN MORE

Summarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”

Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]

LEARN MORE