Placeholder canvas
Date: March 22, 2021

Missouri Supreme Court Revises Civil Discovery Rules By E. Timothy Assouad

by foleyandmansfield
Date: March 22, 2021
by foleyandmansfield

Missouri Supreme Court Revises Civil Discovery Rules By E. Timothy Assouad

Placeholder canvas

On March 2, 2021, the Missouri Supreme Court made notable changes to civil discovery practice and ordered that the new rules take effect September 2, 2021.  The changes will bring Missouri’s discovery rules more in line with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  The discovery rules were originally to go into effect in 2019 pursuant to legislative changes (SB 224, which was signed into law), but the Supreme Court didn’t specifically adopt them, leading to confusion among Missouri counsel.  Below are some noteworthy aspects of the changes.  We will have to wait and see how the new rules play out in practice, especially in fast-paced asbestos litigation with numerous parties, and multi day depositions being commonplace.    

Rule 57.01 (Interrogatories):

-A party may only serve only 25 written interrogatories including subparts, unless stipulated by the parties, or ordered by the court, or approved by local rule (e.g. St. Louis City). 

Rule 57.03 (Depositions):

-A party may only conduct 10 depositions, unless stipulated by the parties or with leave of court.

-A deposition shall be limited to one day of seven hours, unless stipulated by the parties or with leave of court. 

-Depositions can be taken remotely or by telephone via stipulation of the parties or by court order.

Rule 58 (Production of Documents):

-The new rules now specifically address electronic discovery, e.g. allowing a party to require production of electronic discovery in native format. 

Rule 59 (Requests for Admission):

-A party may serve only 25 written requests for admission, unless stipulated by the parties or with leave of court. 

Rule 61.01 (Failure to Make Discovery):

-If objections are made to local approved interrogatories or requests for production (per rule 56.01), and overruled, the court may assess sanctions against the objecting party, attorney or law firm. 

A link to the 3/2/21 Order can be found here:  https://images.magnetmail.net/images/clients/MOBAR//attach/1873.pdf

If you have any questions or concerns with the new rules, please don’t hesitate to contact Foley & Mansfield. 

Ebony S. Morris Selected as a Nominee for the Louisiana Association of Defense Counsel’s 2023 Frank L. Maraist Award

Foley Mansfield is thrilled to announce at Ebony S. Morris, Attorney in the firm’s New Orleans office, has been nominated for the Louisiana Association of Defense Counsel’s (LADC) Frank L. Maraist Award. The Award, established by the LADC’s Young Lawyers Committee in 2015, is named for Professor Maraist, the first […]

LEARN MORE

Foley Mansfield Ranked in 2024 Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms” List

Foley Mansfield is pleased to announce that the firm has been ranked in two regions and practice areas in the 2024 Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms” List, one of the most trusted nationwide classifications available for law firms. Firms on the list are identified for their professional excellence, earning consistently […]

LEARN MORE

Foley Mansfield Recognized by Leadership Council on Legal Diversity as 2023 Compass Award Winner

Foley Mansfield is pleased to announce that the firm is a recipient of the Leadership Council on Legal Diversity’s (LCLD) 2023 Compass Award. This marks the firm’s second year achieving this designation, which recognizes those law firms and corporations demonstrating a strong, continuous commitment to building more diverse organizations and […]

LEARN MORE