Placeholder canvas
Date: March 22, 2021

Missouri Supreme Court Revises Civil Discovery Rules By E. Timothy Assouad

by foleyandmansfield
Date: March 22, 2021
by foleyandmansfield

Missouri Supreme Court Revises Civil Discovery Rules By E. Timothy Assouad

Placeholder canvas

On March 2, 2021, the Missouri Supreme Court made notable changes to civil discovery practice and ordered that the new rules take effect September 2, 2021.  The changes will bring Missouri’s discovery rules more in line with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  The discovery rules were originally to go into effect in 2019 pursuant to legislative changes (SB 224, which was signed into law), but the Supreme Court didn’t specifically adopt them, leading to confusion among Missouri counsel.  Below are some noteworthy aspects of the changes.  We will have to wait and see how the new rules play out in practice, especially in fast-paced asbestos litigation with numerous parties, and multi day depositions being commonplace.    

Rule 57.01 (Interrogatories):

-A party may only serve only 25 written interrogatories including subparts, unless stipulated by the parties, or ordered by the court, or approved by local rule (e.g. St. Louis City). 

Rule 57.03 (Depositions):

-A party may only conduct 10 depositions, unless stipulated by the parties or with leave of court.

-A deposition shall be limited to one day of seven hours, unless stipulated by the parties or with leave of court. 

-Depositions can be taken remotely or by telephone via stipulation of the parties or by court order.

Rule 58 (Production of Documents):

-The new rules now specifically address electronic discovery, e.g. allowing a party to require production of electronic discovery in native format. 

Rule 59 (Requests for Admission):

-A party may serve only 25 written requests for admission, unless stipulated by the parties or with leave of court. 

Rule 61.01 (Failure to Make Discovery):

-If objections are made to local approved interrogatories or requests for production (per rule 56.01), and overruled, the court may assess sanctions against the objecting party, attorney or law firm. 

A link to the 3/2/21 Order can be found here:  https://images.magnetmail.net/images/clients/MOBAR//attach/1873.pdf

If you have any questions or concerns with the new rules, please don’t hesitate to contact Foley & Mansfield. 

Florida Supreme Court Ruling Upends “Marriage Before Injury” Common Law Understanding of Spousal Recovery in Wrongful Death Cases

The Florida Supreme Court has upended a longstanding common law understanding of spousal recovery in wrongful death cases. In a recent decision, the Florida Supreme Court held that a spouse who married a decedent after the onset of the injury that caused decedent’s death is in fact a “surviving spouse” […]

LEARN MORE

Thermonuclear Verdicts on the Rise According to Recent Study

Marathon Strategies published a study regarding the rise in the number of “nuclear verdicts”—those with verdicts surpassing $10 million in damages—in the United States in 2023 and termed a new phrase– “thermonuclear verdicts.” The number of cases with nuclear verdicts has increased in 2023 by 27% from 2022, a 15-year […]

LEARN MORE

EPA’s Final Rule to Reduce Methane and Other Pollution from Oil and Natural Gas Operations

In November 2021, pursuant to the Biden Administration’s “U.S. Methane Emissions Reduction Plan” and under the terms of the Inflation Reduction Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published a proposed rule intended to mitigate climate-destabilizing pollution and protect human health by reducing greenhouse gases, including methane, and volatile organic compound […]

LEARN MORE