Placeholder canvas
Date: August 29, 2018

Florida Medical Malpractice Team Wins at Trial, Appeal

by foleyandmansfield
Date: August 29, 2018
by foleyandmansfield

Florida Medical Malpractice Team Wins at Trial, Appeal

Placeholder canvas

Foley & Mansfield’s medical malpractice defense trial team consisting of Kevin O’Conner and Mary Street successfully defended our client physician at the trial level and through the plaintiff’s subsequent appeal, obtaining an appellate affirmance of the trial court’s dismissal of the case with prejudice.

At the trial level, the defense moved to dismiss the complaint against our client because the plaintiff did not comply with any statutory conditions precedent to filing a medical malpractice lawsuit in Florida. Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act requires, among other things, presuit notice to the prospective defendant, an affidavit from an expert corroborating the plaintiff’s allegations of negligence, and a good faith and reasonable investigation into the basis of the claim. The trial court dismissed the case against our client with prejudice because we successfully argued that the plaintiff never notified our client of the claim during presuit, did not provide a legally sufficient corroborating expert affidavit, and did not investigate a claim against our client at all, let alone within the applicable statute of limitations.

The plaintiff appealed the dismissal to Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal, which affirmed, agreeing that the plaintiff did not comply with Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act within the applicable statute of limitations, and holding that the trial court correctly dismissed the case against our client with prejudice.

Kevin O’Conner and Mary Street

Amended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation

A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]

LEARN MORE

Summarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”

Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]

LEARN MORE

Minnesota Legislature Seeks to Change Newly Effective Earned Safe and Sick Time Law

By now, employers should be familiar with and implementing (if applicable) Minnesota’s Earned Safe and Sick Time law (“ESST”) that took effect on January 1, 2024. ESST is paid leave that an employee may use when they or a family member are sick, need to see a doctor or medical […]

LEARN MORE