Placeholder canvas
Date: April 24, 2019

Beseau Prevails in Missouri Court of Appeals JOAN L. ROBINSON v JOHN F. LANGENBACH, JUDY LANFRI f/k/a JUDY LONGBROOK and PERMA-JACK COMPANY

by foleyandmansfield
Date: April 24, 2019
by foleyandmansfield

Beseau Prevails in Missouri Court of Appeals JOAN L. ROBINSON v JOHN F. LANGENBACH, JUDY LANFRI f/k/a JUDY LONGBROOK and PERMA-JACK COMPANY

Placeholder canvas

Foley & Mansfield’s John G. Beseau prevailed in a recent Missouri appellate decision in a shareholder dispute, with The Court of Appeals affirming a jury verdict in our client’s favor and the Trial Court’s equitable judgment ordering a buyout of our client’s shares.

Beseau represented Joan Robinson, who, along with her two siblings, were equal shareholders and directors of Perma-Jack Company (“PJC”).  PJC is a franchisor of a foundation piering system that was started by the parties’ father and gifted to them when he retired.  Robinson and her brother, John Langenbach, managed and operated PJC together for about 30 years. Joan served as president, and John served as vice president.  Their other sibling, Judy Lanfri, lived on the West Coast and was never employed by PJC or involved in day-to-day operations.

In June 2012, Langenbach and Lanfri, as a majority of the Board of Directors, expelled Robinson from the company.  Robinson filed suit in St. Louis County for, among other things, Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Shareholder Oppression (a statutory claim vesting the Trial Court with jurisdiction to grant an array of equitable remedies if a case of oppression is found).

After getting a summary judgment in favor of Langenbach and Lanfri reversed in the case’s first trip to the Court of Appeals in 2014, the Breach of Fiduciary Duty claim was tried before a jury in February 2017. The jury found for Robinson and awarded her $390,000. A bench trial for the Shareholder Oppression claim followed, and the Trial Court ordered Langenbach and Lanfri to purchase Robinson’s one-third of PJC for $59,000. The Court of Appeals affirmed both the verdict and equitable judgment.

Read the Decision

Read About the Case in the St. Louis Recorder.

John G. Beseau

Summarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”

Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]

LEARN MORE

Minnesota Legislature Seeks to Change Newly Effective Earned Safe and Sick Time Law

By now, employers should be familiar with and implementing (if applicable) Minnesota’s Earned Safe and Sick Time law (“ESST”) that took effect on January 1, 2024. ESST is paid leave that an employee may use when they or a family member are sick, need to see a doctor or medical […]

LEARN MORE

Florida’s Amended “Limited Appearance Attorneys” Rule Effective April 1

Effective immediately, “Limited Appearance Attorneys,” an amended rule of civil procedure, Rule 1.041 titled, takes effect. The rule provides clients with flexibility to pick and choose whether, when, and to what extent to involve appellate counsel as trial support for their chosen trial attorney. The rule will make it simpler for […]

LEARN MORE