Chicago
Since October, 2007, our Chicago law offices have effectively handled a range of litigation and transactional matters for clients on both a local and national basis. Our Chicago attorneys often team with our other offices to provide complete coverage in many areas of law.
- jrejano@foleymansfield.com
- 312-254-3800
55 W. Monroe St., Suite 3430
Chicago, IL 60603
Joseph Rejano is the managing partner of Foley Mansfield’s Chicago Office focusing his practice on commercial litigation, product liability, and toxic tort and mass tort litigation. Joseph's commercial litigation experience includes collections, bankruptcy, and labor and employment. He also has extensive litigation experience representing clients in the areas of subrogation and premises liability.
Joseph leads Foley Mansfield’s Data and Innovation team and is co-chair of Foley Mansfield’s Diversity Committee. Joseph is passionate about creating models to innovate the legal industry particularly in the litigation management, alternative fee structure, and diversity spaces. While attending the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law, Joseph served as a title editor for the University of Detroit Mercy Law Review. In his spare time, Joseph enjoys spending time with his family and watching his two children play soccer, volleyball, and basketball.
All Related Professionals
Related News
Redefining The Workforce: Implementation of the DOL’s Independent Contractor Rule
On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor’s much anticipated rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act regarding the classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors officially came into effect. However, there are several pending lawsuits in different states seeking to prohibit the implementation of the new […]
LEARN MOREAmended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation
A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]
LEARN MORESummarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”
Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]
LEARN MORERedefining The Workforce: Implementation of the DOL’s Independent Contractor Rule
On March 11, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor’s much anticipated rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act regarding the classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors officially came into effect. However, there are several pending lawsuits in different states seeking to prohibit the implementation of the new […]
LEARN MOREAmended FRE 702 Creates Path for Expert Challenges in Talc Litigation
A recent update to the federal rules governing the use of expert testimony/evidence in federal court will widely impact how scientific and medical evidence is presented to juries in federal matters, including talcum powder litigation. With the change to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE 702”), defendants […]
LEARN MORESummarizing “ILR Briefly: The Asbestos Over-Naming and Trust Transparency Problem: A Philadelphia Case Study”
Introduction Asbestos litigation has become a cornerstone of the American legal landscape, spanning over four decades, and involving more than a million individual personal injury claims across state and federal courts. In 2012, a commentary titled “The Philadelphia Story: Asbestos Litigation, Bankruptcy Trusts, and Changes in Exposure Allegations from 1991-2010” […]
LEARN MORE